HomeHome  ­FAQFAQ  ­SearchSearch  ­RegisterRegister  ­MemberlistMemberlist  ­UsergroupsUsergroups  ­Log inLog in  
Clean Slate Society Forum  :: 

Discussion

 :: 

General Topics

 :: 

Cleanslate Constitution

 
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Font color:    Font size:  Fonts:  Close Tags
 
   


Options-
HTML is OFF
BBCode is ON
Smilies are ON
 
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Jump to:  
Topic review
AuthorMessage
Mike
17.11.09 5:53  

Hey guys. I think we'd better start concentrating on the issue of increasing the sites exposure before we start comitting to these things. We have like what, 5 active members? At most? C'mon dudes, lets put our thinking caps on ;-)
webtaz99
15.11.09 6:28  

Rights, rights, rights. What about responsibilities?
NoMoreLies
23.07.09 12:35  

Any other opinions?
Redsand11j
01.06.09 20:42  

I voted "No way!", but only because I think it is far too early to be making a constitution. We haven't even agreed on what the government should be like yet.

Therefore, I say that any constitution is premature.
NoMoreLies
01.06.09 17:36  

I'm hoping to keep it within a few pages; all that I think needs defining is 'harm', 'human being', and 'unneccesary'. Anything else?

The judicials system, crimes, and punishments would be laid out in a seperate document, as would the way of funding the government and the use of military force.

Once we have a constitution agreed, we can get to work on those other important documents.