Home
FAQ
Search
Register
Memberlist
Usergroups
Log in
Clean Slate Society Forum
::
Discussion
::
General Topics
::
Cleanslate Constitution
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Fonts:
Default
Arial
Arial Black
Comic Sans Ms
Courier New
Georgia
Impact
Times New Roman
Trebuchet MS
Verdana
Close Tags
Options
Options
HTML is OFF
BBCode
is ON
Smilies are ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Jump to:
Select a forum
|
|--Discussion
|--General Topics
|--Clean Slate Government
|--Clean Slate Economics
|--Clean Slate Technology
|--Free Chat
|--Links
Topic review
Author
Message
Mike
17.11.09 5:53
Hey guys. I think we'd better start concentrating on the issue of increasing the sites exposure before we start comitting to these things. We have like what, 5 active members? At most? C'mon dudes, lets put our thinking caps on ;-)
webtaz99
15.11.09 6:28
Rights, rights, rights. What about responsibilities?
NoMoreLies
23.07.09 12:35
Any other opinions?
Redsand11j
01.06.09 20:42
I voted "No way!", but only because I think it is far too early to be making a constitution. We haven't even agreed on what the government should be like yet.
Therefore, I say that any constitution is premature.
NoMoreLies
01.06.09 17:36
I'm hoping to keep it within a few pages; all that I think needs defining is 'harm', 'human being', and 'unneccesary'. Anything else?
The judicials system, crimes, and punishments would be laid out in a seperate document, as would the way of funding the government and the use of military force.
Once we have a constitution agreed, we can get to work on those other important documents.