HomeHome  ­FAQFAQ  ­SearchSearch  ­RegisterRegister  ­MemberlistMemberlist  ­UsergroupsUsergroups  ­Log inLog in  
Clean Slate Society Forum  :: 

Discussion

 :: 

General Topics

 :: 

Legacy (& abortion rights...)

 
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Font color:    Font size:  Fonts:  Close Tags
 
   


Options-
HTML is OFF
BBCode is ON
Smilies are ON
 
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Jump to:  
Topic review
AuthorMessage
Redsand11j
22.03.09 5:15  

oh, now I see, it was the syntactical ambiguities of english. I wish I spoke lojban.

Well, do you have a source to support your assertion that children raised in gay households do less well than others?
NoMoreLies
21.03.09 18:34  

They wouldn't have both a Father AND a Mother, they'd have EITHER two Fathers OR two mothers.

They need a father AND a mother. While I wouldn't completely ban single parenting, I think it should be discouraged.
Redsand11j
21.03.09 16:28  

how would they lack a father AND a mother. In the example of male homosexuals, they will lack a mother, but have two fathers.
NoMoreLies
21.03.09 0:00  

When a gay couple adopt, the child will be lacking a Father AND a Mother. You *are* aware of what the word 'and' means, I take it?

Or,,,, the child will be lacking either a Father or a Mother. So they won't have both, as it a Father AND a Mother.

I have two simple rules: 1) Don't do anything that has a too much of a negative effect on someone, and 2) Be who you want to be, except when it conflicts with the first law. I'll probably right in a third law, and find someway of of clarifying the 1st law, but it'll do for now. I can then deduce all other laws from those.
Redsand11j
15.03.09 19:55  

Do you mean maybe or?

I see no logic there.