Home
FAQ
Search
Register
Memberlist
Usergroups
Log in
Clean Slate Society Forum
::
Discussion
::
General Topics
::
Legacy (& abortion rights...)
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Fonts:
Default
Arial
Arial Black
Comic Sans Ms
Courier New
Georgia
Impact
Times New Roman
Trebuchet MS
Verdana
Close Tags
Options
Options
HTML is OFF
BBCode
is ON
Smilies are ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Jump to:
Select a forum
|
|--Discussion
|--General Topics
|--Clean Slate Government
|--Clean Slate Economics
|--Clean Slate Technology
|--Free Chat
|--Links
Topic review
Author
Message
Redsand11j
22.03.09 5:15
oh, now I see, it was the syntactical ambiguities of english. I wish I spoke lojban.
Well, do you have a source to support your assertion that children raised in gay households do less well than others?
NoMoreLies
21.03.09 18:34
They wouldn't have both a Father AND a Mother, they'd have EITHER two Fathers OR two mothers.
They need a father AND a mother. While I wouldn't completely ban single parenting, I think it should be discouraged.
Redsand11j
21.03.09 16:28
how would they lack a father AND a mother. In the example of male homosexuals, they will lack a mother, but have two fathers.
NoMoreLies
21.03.09 0:00
When a gay couple adopt, the child will be lacking a Father AND a Mother. You *are* aware of what the word 'and' means, I take it?
Or,,,, the child will be lacking either a Father or a Mother. So they won't have both, as it a Father AND a Mother.
I have two simple rules: 1) Don't do anything that has a too much of a negative effect on someone, and 2) Be who you want to be, except when it conflicts with the first law. I'll probably right in a third law, and find someway of of clarifying the 1st law, but it'll do for now. I can then deduce all other laws from those.
Redsand11j
15.03.09 19:55
Do you mean maybe or?
I see no logic there.