Home
FAQ
Search
Register
Memberlist
Usergroups
Log in
Clean Slate Society Forum
::
Discussion
::
General Topics
::
Clean Slate location
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Fonts:
Default
Arial
Arial Black
Comic Sans Ms
Courier New
Georgia
Impact
Times New Roman
Trebuchet MS
Verdana
Close Tags
Options
Options
HTML is OFF
BBCode
is ON
Smilies are ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Jump to:
Select a forum
|
|--Discussion
|--General Topics
|--Clean Slate Government
|--Clean Slate Economics
|--Clean Slate Technology
|--Free Chat
|--Links
Topic review
Author
Message
Redsand11j
23.10.08 4:04
yeah, or we could purposely melt it (Gasp!)
lkm
22.10.08 16:42
If we purchased a chunk of glacier, it might be cheaper and a solid investment for when it melted due to global warming and we then had virgin land.
Redsand11j
12.10.08 16:11
I think they would accept a few million dollars for one of those Fjords. Especially since greenland has home rule, and we would be buying it from them. (If our city grows to a measley 100,000, that would be tripling the population of greenland, and more likely than not we would end up with the whole island.)
lkm
12.10.08 13:17
I think my point was that they've already refused a large chunk of money on principle. I think they might retain those principles in the face of a much smaller chunk of money.
Redsand11j
11.10.08 22:55
yes, but we would only buy a small sliver.