HomeHome  ­FAQFAQ  ­SearchSearch  ­RegisterRegister  ­MemberlistMemberlist  ­UsergroupsUsergroups  ­Log inLog in  
Clean Slate Society Forum  :: 

Discussion

 :: 

General Topics

 :: 

Clean Slate location

 
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Font color:    Font size:  Fonts:  Close Tags
 
   


Options-
HTML is OFF
BBCode is ON
Smilies are ON
 
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Jump to:  
Topic review
AuthorMessage
Redsand11j
23.10.08 4:04  

yeah, or we could purposely melt it (Gasp!)
lkm
22.10.08 16:42  

If we purchased a chunk of glacier, it might be cheaper and a solid investment for when it melted due to global warming and we then had virgin land.
Redsand11j
12.10.08 16:11  

I think they would accept a few million dollars for one of those Fjords. Especially since greenland has home rule, and we would be buying it from them. (If our city grows to a measley 100,000, that would be tripling the population of greenland, and more likely than not we would end up with the whole island.)
lkm
12.10.08 13:17  

I think my point was that they've already refused a large chunk of money on principle. I think they might retain those principles in the face of a much smaller chunk of money.
Redsand11j
11.10.08 22:55  

yes, but we would only buy a small sliver.