Home
FAQ
Search
Register
Memberlist
Usergroups
Log in
Clean Slate Society Forum
::
Discussion
::
Free Chat
::
To the moon and beyond, or not as the budget may be
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Fonts:
Default
Arial
Arial Black
Comic Sans Ms
Courier New
Georgia
Impact
Times New Roman
Trebuchet MS
Verdana
Close Tags
Options
Options
HTML is OFF
BBCode
is ON
Smilies are ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Jump to:
Select a forum
|
|--Discussion
|--General Topics
|--Clean Slate Government
|--Clean Slate Economics
|--Clean Slate Technology
|--Free Chat
|--Links
Topic review
Author
Message
davamanra
07.10.08 23:24
The Russians seem to have a pretty good system.IMHO part of the problem of the shuttle was we asked it to do too much. As I said before I have nothing but admiration for the shuttle's designers, but it was ahead of it's time. The Direct proposal has a lot of merit as it is using numerous tried and true components. It wouldn't be too hard to build in a large margin of simplicity, ruggedness, reliability and safety with an LV like Jupiter 232. Will we find problems as we proceed? Of course, but with this production line approach we can optimize, improve and correct as we go. We can just keep on cranking out the equivalent of Model T spacecraft every month or so. Depending on the mission(s) that we are launching we build the necessary modules to fit the requirement and send them up.
lkm
07.10.08 22:39
Can the words, simple, rugged and reliable ever really be applied to launch system?
davamanra
07.10.08 22:11
IMHO develop a Saturn V class booster that is crude, rugged and reliable and can be built in a production line manner. Develop a standardized module system that can put a wide variety of payloads into orbit, again built in a production line manner.
From there arrange a launch schedule that would launch a new mission into orbit about once a month.
Do not try and over-think or over-optimize the system. Make it simple, rugged and reliable so that it can do the job and being in a production line system the costs will plummet.
Establish a way station in orbit to for the payloads to dock to. From there the way station crew will set up the payload for whatever mission it has and launch from there.
lkm
07.10.08 16:36
Assuming the Griffin plan succeeds and NASA is left in 2010 with absolutely no manned space program at all, STS is retired and dismantled, the workforce has been desimated and fired, Ares 1/V have been canceled as unworkable and far too expensive, and thus NASA is free to begin again with a clean slate, what should it do?
lkm
20.09.08 12:43
Human nature is self-interested, and it's in everyones to, by and large, get along. So we do, by and large.