HomeHome  ­FAQFAQ  ­SearchSearch  ­RegisterRegister  ­MemberlistMemberlist  ­UsergroupsUsergroups  ­Log inLog in  
Clean Slate Society Forum  :: 

Discussion

 :: 

General Topics

 :: 

Libertarian Ocean Colonies

 
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Font color:    Font size:  Fonts:  Close Tags
 
   


Options-
HTML is OFF
BBCode is ON
Smilies are ON
 
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Jump to:  
Topic review
AuthorMessage
Locksley
17.08.09 1:20  

It makes it less practical, not unfeasible. It needs to be a Plan B of sorts if we can't find land.
Redsand11j
16.08.09 21:40  

I won't argue with the space colonization thing.

However, the high cost, measured in dollars or in actual resources, of ocean platforms makes them infeasible.
Locksley
16.08.09 21:31  

Precisely. Ergo colonization of space is the logical next step in human progression.

But to do that, we really could use a new government that has that as its goal, instead of world domination or subjugation of its population.
NoMoreLies
16.08.09 20:30  

Having a static amount of land has one fatal flaw: it's like a monopoly game with people entering the game after all the properties been sold off - they've very little chance of winning, or even surviving.
Redsand11j
16.08.09 15:56  

And is that totally unfeasible? There are a lot of countries that need money more than they need land.