Home
FAQ
Search
Register
Memberlist
Usergroups
Log in
Clean Slate Society Forum
::
Discussion
::
General Topics
::
what is the goal?
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Fonts:
Default
Arial
Arial Black
Comic Sans Ms
Courier New
Georgia
Impact
Times New Roman
Trebuchet MS
Verdana
Close Tags
Options
Options
HTML is OFF
BBCode
is ON
Smilies are ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Jump to:
Select a forum
|
|--Discussion
|--General Topics
|--Clean Slate Government
|--Clean Slate Economics
|--Clean Slate Technology
|--Free Chat
|--Links
Topic review
Author
Message
Redsand11j
21.03.09 16:26
well, those seem they would be more like the bill of rights in the USA, although I suppose it could work if sent strait to the judicial. Then congress (See my post in the location thread) would spend it's time only on programs, of which I approve.
NoMoreLies
21.03.09 0:08
What should be the goal? To quote myself from the Abortion thread:
I wrote:
I have two simple rules: 1) Don't do anything that has a too much of a negative effect on someone, and 2) Be who you want to be, except when it conflicts with the first law. I'll probably right in a third law, and find someway of of clarifying the 1st law, but it'll do for now. I can then deduce all other laws from those.
Now, in effect the 1st law is to protect the 2nd, but also limits the second law. I'll do some more thinking on the 1st law, to clarify what precisely I mean. Claiming that you are hurt emotionally by what your friend/child/etc wants to be, so therefore they can't do it as it would conflict with the first law. If that friend/child/etc decided to become a morally degenerate sadomasochistic woman beater, however, then that *would* be a case of conflict with the first law. Tricky cases include
Gay adoption - effects on the child
Divorce - again, effects on the children
Sadomasochists - if they want to be whipped and beaten themselves
Etc - I trust you get the idea now
The goal of society should be to implement those two laws (three if I can come up with another one, perhaps to regulate the expression of them enough to make it [near] failsafe).
Redsand11j
15.03.09 19:58
I'm not totally sure how well this one would work, but ideally, paying people proportionally to E in is the best. This is the CS, after all. Even if it's not workable, though, we should include some elements of this into our chosen economy.
NoMoreLies
15.03.09 16:28
Then you end up with everyone applying for certain jobs, and no-one applying for others. So long as there is a pay differential, though, the economy will still work.
Make people get a job after becoming unemployed, and give them a week to choose. That way, we can minimize how much money they require to keep them going.
Redsand11j
14.03.09 18:52
people post jobs that need to be done on some sort of job market. One can choose whichever job one feels they can work the most at or will enjoy the most. Perhaps you need to pay for a posting, so as not to have people putting up frivolous and useless things.