HomeHome  ­FAQFAQ  ­SearchSearch  ­RegisterRegister  ­MemberlistMemberlist  ­UsergroupsUsergroups  ­Log inLog in  
Clean Slate Society Forum  :: 

Discussion

 :: 

Clean Slate Technology

 :: 

Tech Level

 
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Font color:    Font size:  Fonts:  Close Tags
 
   


Options-
HTML is OFF
BBCode is ON
Smilies are ON
 
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Jump to:  
Topic review
AuthorMessage
Redsand11j
16.06.09 18:46  

Oops, my bad- calculation error! It seems that, assuming 100% efficiency in everything, only 1 MW year would be needed. However, it seems likely to me that Alpha particles/protons would be preferable to betas, so call the particle accelerator 65% efficient, that's 1.5 megawatt-years.

1.5 megawatts is the amount of energy used by about 130 people in the US. (Admittedly, the US has the highest energy useage per capita in the world, but even in Bangladesh (The lowest power per capita, 200 watts per person), the number is 7500 people.

Either way, the CSCS (and, scarily enough, and organization, be it major or minor) could do this with little difficulty.
Redsand11j
15.03.09 20:01  

yeah. This would be 200 MW at 2 MV, and 100 amps.
NoMoreLies
15.03.09 16:33  

One volt*one amp=one watt, right? So that's two megawatts at one amp, and two kilowatts at one milliamp. Hmmm... Twisted Evil
Redsand11j
14.03.09 18:54  

but since it's so hard to separate fissile uranium from regular, and takes such large facilities, a nuclear program is pretty easy to spot. This would be a much simpler and low profile operation.
NoMoreLies
14.03.09 18:10  

Orion Shall Rise!

Those countires could get Uranium easily anyway. It's not that hard, if you have the right contacts. Look at Iran and North Korea. They alread have some.