Home
FAQ
Search
Register
Memberlist
Usergroups
Log in
Clean Slate Society Forum
::
Discussion
::
General Topics
::
clean-slate military
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Fonts:
Default
Arial
Arial Black
Comic Sans Ms
Courier New
Georgia
Impact
Times New Roman
Trebuchet MS
Verdana
Close Tags
Options
Options
HTML is OFF
BBCode
is ON
Smilies are ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Jump to:
Select a forum
|
|--Discussion
|--General Topics
|--Clean Slate Government
|--Clean Slate Economics
|--Clean Slate Technology
|--Free Chat
|--Links
Topic review
Author
Message
lkm
30.10.08 22:40
And have already done in most of the countries in question, hence their current troublesomeness.
NoMoreLies
30.10.08 18:53
But those can be corrupted even further in a way that's advantageus to us. We'll pay for a Coup dé Etat in the country.
It's what the CIA do.
lkm
30.10.08 18:23
That is only a valid tactic against a functional democracy accountable to its population who desire a successful econnomy. Unfortunately most of the 'troublesome' countries are neither functional nor democracies and so are free to persue priorities other than economic wellbeing.
NoMoreLies
30.10.08 15:56
What I meant was make it so all other nations that could cause trouble can't, because it would damage their economy almost irrepareably.
lkm
29.10.08 19:27
Em, quite the opposite I would have thought. Going to war with a country you owe money to has long been a traditional method of getting out of paying off your debts. It's actually a compelling reason for the US to commit to the war with China, China has so much foreign currency reserves that having them frozen would be seriously debilitating.